Sullivan v. United States

74 Ct. Cl. 588, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 437, 1932 WL 2068
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMay 2, 1932
DocketNo. L-402
StatusPublished

This text of 74 Ct. Cl. 588 (Sullivan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. United States, 74 Ct. Cl. 588, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 437, 1932 WL 2068 (cc 1932).

Opinion

Williams, Judge,

delivered the opinion:

The plaintiff, a lieutenant (junior grade) of the United States Navy, brings this suit to recover increased rental and [590]*590subsistence allowances because of a dependent mother from May 8, 1928,- to January 1, 1931. The claim is based on section 4 of the act of June 10, 1922 (42 Stat. 625, 627), which provides as follows:

“Sec. 4. That the term ‘dependent’ as used in the succeeding sections of this act shall include at all times and in all places a lawful wife and unmarried children under twenty-one years of age. It shall also include the mother of the officer provided she is in fact dependent on him for her chief support.”

The only issue in the case is whether the plaintiff’s mother was in fact dependent on him for her chief support during the period of the claim.

The findings show that the mother’s only income, aside from the contributions received from the plaintiff, was $27.77 per month — half the amount required for rent on the house occupied by her and her minor children during the period of the claim, leaving nothing whatever for food, clothing, medicine, and her other usual and necessary living expenses.

It is obvious that plaintiff’s contributions constituted by far the larger part of her reasonable and necessary living expenses, and that she was, within the meaning of section 4 of the act of June 10, 1922, dependent on the plaintiff for her chief support. Freeland v. United States, 64 C. Cls. 364; James DeB. Walbach v. United States, 67 C. Cls. 239; Halloran v. United States, 69 C. Cls. 59.

Under the rule announced in these cases, and in other decisions of this court too numerous to require citations here, the plaintiff, under the facts shown, is entitled to recover the rental and subsistence allowances provided for an officer in the United States Navy, of his rank, from May 8, 1928, to January 1, 1931. The entry of judgment will be made on receipt from the General Accounting Office of a statement of the amount due the plaintiff in accordance with this opinion. It is so ordered.

Whaley, Judge; LittletoN, Judge; Green, Judge; and Booth, Ghiej Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freeland v. United States
64 Ct. Cl. 364 (Court of Claims, 1928)
Walbach v. United States
67 Ct. Cl. 239 (Court of Claims, 1929)
Halloran v. United States
69 Ct. Cl. 59 (Court of Claims, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ct. Cl. 588, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 437, 1932 WL 2068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-united-states-cc-1932.