Sullivan v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1611

DONALD SULLIVAN; JEFFREY S. SULLIVAN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GEORGE W. BUSH; JOEL HEFLEY, Chairman, House Committee on Official Conduct; HENRY HYDE, Chairman, House Committee on International Affairs; JOHN BARGO, Chief-of-Staff, House Committee on Official Conduct; 535 JOHN DOES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-39-7-F)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 25, 2003

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior District Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Sullivan, Jeffrey S. Sullivan, Appellants Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Vincent Garvey, Scott Ramsey McIntosh, Teal Elizabeth Luthy, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Donald Sullivan and Jeffrey S. Sullivan appeal the district

court’s order dismissing their complaint and denying, as moot,

their motion for preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Sullivan v. United

States, No. CA-03-39-7-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2003). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED