Sullivan v. Troser Management, Inc.
30 A.D.3d 1118, 816 N.Y.S.2d 395
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2006
StatusPublished
This text of 30 A.D.3d 1118 (Sullivan v. Troser Management, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sullivan v. Troser Management, Inc., 30 A.D.3d 1118, 816 N.Y.S.2d 395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
Motion for stay denied. Memorandum: Because appellant can obtain an automatic stay (see CPLR 5519 [a] [4], [5]), a discretionary stay is not available pursuant to CPLR 5519 (c) (see Kightlinger v Kightlinger, 231 AD2d 969 [1996]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ. (Filed May 17, 2006.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kightlinger v. Kightlinger
231 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 1118, 816 N.Y.S.2d 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-troser-management-inc-nyappdiv-2006.