Sullivan v. Triboro Coach Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sullivan v. Triboro Coach Corp.

276 A.D.2d 769

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 769 (Sullivan v. Triboro Coach Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullivan v. Triboro Coach Corp., 276 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Sneed, J., dissents and votes to affirm, with the following memorandum: Upon the proof adduced, the question of respondent’s contributory negligence was for the jury. (Knapp V. Barrett, 216 N. Y. 226.) Under the charge, to which there was no exception taken, the jury were warranted in finding that the operator of appellant’s bus was guilty of negligence which caused the accident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Sneed, J., dissents and votes to affirm, with the following memorandum: Upon the proof adduced, the question of respondent’s contributory negligence was for the jury. (Knapp V. Barrett, 216 N. Y. 226.) Under the charge, to which there was no exception taken, the jury were warranted in finding that the operator of appellant’s bus was guilty of negligence which caused the accident.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-triboro-coach-corp-nyappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack