Sullivan v. Travers-Goetz Associates, Inc.
This text of 284 A.D. 908 (Sullivan v. Travers-Goetz Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action to recover a claimed balance due upon an alleged loan, an order was made which, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and a judgment in favor of plaintiff was accordingly [909]*909entered. Both the order and judgment were thereafter resettled. The appeal is by defendant from the judgment as resettled. Resettled judgment reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied, without costs. A triable issue of fact exists as to whether the loan was made by respondent and whether the balance owing thereon is payable to him. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt, and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 908, 134 N.Y.S.2d 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-travers-goetz-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1954.