Sullivan v. Travers-Goetz Associates, Inc.

284 A.D. 908, 134 N.Y.S.2d 581
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 25, 1954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In this action to recover a claimed balance due upon an alleged loan, an order was made which, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and a judgment in favor of plaintiff was accordingly [909] entered. Both the order and judgment were thereafter resettled. The appeal is by defendant from the judgment as resettled. Resettled judgment reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied, without costs. A triable issue of fact exists as to whether the loan was made by respondent and whether the balance owing thereon is payable to him. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt, and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Travers-Goetz Associates, Inc., 284 A.D. 908, 134 N.Y.S.2d 581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

284 A.D. 908 (Sullivan v. Travers-Goetz Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. Santoro
36 Misc. 2d 409 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)