Sullivan v. Town of Hodges

172 So. 675, 27 Ala. App. 373, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 20
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 16, 1937
Docket8 Div. 410.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 172 So. 675 (Sullivan v. Town of Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. Town of Hodges, 172 So. 675, 27 Ala. App. 373, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 20 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appeals from convictions for violating the terms of municipal ordinances, in so far as procedure in this court is concerned, are governed by the rules obtaining in appeals from judgments in civil cases. Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571.

Applying, as we must (Code 1923, § 7318), those rules to the instant appeal, we are forced to affirm the judgment of conviction. And it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meadows v. State
473 So. 2d 582 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Bell v. State
435 So. 2d 772 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Williams v. State
383 So. 2d 547 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 So. 675, 27 Ala. App. 373, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-town-of-hodges-alactapp-1937.