Sullivan v. Swift & Co.

153 So. 2d 30, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3676
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 1963·No. No. 62-620·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of adverse summary decrees of the trial judge, dismissing her complaint for recision of a mortgage and granting the appellee’s counterclaim for foreclosure of said mortgage.

Reviewing the record in a light most favorable to the appellant, which we are required to do in reviewing summary decrees or judgments [see: Pritchard v. Peppercorn and Peppercorn, Inc., Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 769; Humphrys v. Jarrell, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 404], it appears that there was no genuine issue of a material fact which would as a matter of law permit the appellant to rescind or defeat the mortgage in question upon the ground of duress. See: Jones v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., Fla.App.1959, 109 So.2d 582; [31] Duncan Plastering Company v. Giffen Building Specialties, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 532.

Therefore, the actions of the chancellor are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Swift & Co., 153 So. 2d 30, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

153 So. 2d 30 (Sullivan v. Swift & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Baker
206 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Sork v. United Benefit Life Insurance Company
161 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)