Sullivan v. Sullivan
This text of 209 A.D. 910 (Sullivan v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law, with costs to appellant, and judgment unanimously directed in favor of plaintiff, with costs. Conclusions of law contained in the decision herein numbered IV, VI, VII, VIII and IX are reversed, and this court finds the conclusions of law proposed by plaintiff numbered 1 to 4 inclusive. We think this ease is controlled by the decision in Van Blaricum v. Larson (205 N. Y. 355), and that the violation by plaintiff of the provisions contained in the prior decree of divorce obtained by her former husband, prohibiting her remarriage, in no way affected or prevented the assertion by her of her dower right. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-1924.