Sullivan v. Sullivan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sullivan v. Sullivan

791 So. 2d 1119, 2000 WL 1781353

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 6, 2000

DocketNo. 4D00-262

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 791 So. 2d 1119 (Sullivan v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullivan v. Sullivan, 791 So. 2d 1119, 2000 WL 1781353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm under the principles of Apple-gate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) because the record does not contain the transcript of the trial court’s proceedings. Although we are cognizant of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(f)(2), the appellee in his answer brief specifically pointed out that the transcript was not contained in the record. “Where, as here, the appellees point out the deficiency in the record in their brief and appellants do not move to supplement the record, this court takes the position that compliance with rule 9.200(f)(2) has been waived.” Cirillo v. Davis, 732 So.2d 387, 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm under the principles of Apple-gate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) because the record does not contain the transcript of the trial court’s proceedings. Although we are cognizant of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(f)(2), the appellee in his answer brief specifically pointed out that the transcript was not contained in the record. “Where, as here, the appellees point out the deficiency in the record in their brief and appellants do not move to supplement the record, this court takes the position that compliance with rule 9.200(f)(2) has been waived.” Cirillo v. Davis, 732 So.2d 387, 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

791 So. 2d 1119, 2000 WL 1781353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-sullivan-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack