Sullivan v. State

599 So. 2d 722, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6391, 1992 WL 112135
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sullivan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 562 So. 2d 813
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1992·No. No. 91-02940·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises four points on appeal. We find merit, however, in only one. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in imposing a three year minimum mandatory sentence for the possession of a firearm. We agree. Possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is not one of the enumerated offenses in section 775.087(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), which requires a minimum mandatory sentence. Coleman v. State, 496 So.2d 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Simmons v. State, 457 So.2d 534 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Therefore, we remand for resen-tencing in conformance with the oral pronouncement. The trial court should strike the minimum mandatory portion of appellant’s sentence. Appellant need not be present at the resentencing.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

RYDER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. State, 599 So. 2d 722, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6391, 1992 WL 112135 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

599 So. 2d 722 (Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. State
457 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Coleman v. State
496 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)