Sullivan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sullivan v. State

453 So. 2d 537, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13990

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sullivan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19171 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 1984·No. Nos. 83-1919, 83-1915 to 83-1918·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s revocation of defendant’s probation and in the trial court’s sentencing of defendant on the convictions for which defendant had received probation. This is without prejudice to defendant filing a motion under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Williams v. State, 438 So.2d 781, 786 (Fla.1983).

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s revocation of defendant’s probation and in the trial court’s sentencing of defendant on the convictions for which defendant had received probation. This is without prejudice to defendant filing a motion under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Williams v. State, 438 So.2d 781, 786 (Fla.1983).

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Sullivan v. State, 453 So. 2d 537, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13990 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

453 So. 2d 537 (Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related