Sullivan v. State

171 So. 508, 27 Ala. App. 297, 1936 Ala. App. LEXIS 171
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 1936·No. 6 Div. 97.·Published

Opinion

*298 BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense of grand larceny, the defendant appealed to this court. There is no hill of exceptions in the record and the trial judge certifies that no bill of exceptions has been presented to him in this case, and, further, that the time for such presentation has expired. The appeal, therefore, is rested upon the record proper only. Upon examination of this record, we find the proceedings of the lower court were regular in all things. No error appearing, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. State, 171 So. 508, 27 Ala. App. 297, 1936 Ala. App. LEXIS 171 (Ala. Ct. App. 1936).

171 So. 508 (Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.