Sullivan v. Smith

72 S.E.2d 318, 209 Ga. 325, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 535
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 2, 1952·No. 17923·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Candler, Justice.

1. In those cases to which the pleading and practice act of 1946 is applicable, the defendant is required to answer the petition within thirty days after service of the petition and process, and all demurrers and pleas of the defendant shall be filed in or before the time stated in the process as the appearance day. Ga. L. 1946, pp. 761, 773 (Code, Ann. Supp., §§ 81-201, 81-301).

2. When a number of days is prescribed by law for the exercise of a privilege, or the discharge of a duty, only the first or the last day shall be counted and, in computing the number of days, the first or the last day should be excluded. Code, § 102-102 (8); Rusk v. Hill, 117 Ga. 722 (1) (45 S. E. 42); Walker v. Neil, 117 Ga. 733 (2) (45 S. E. 387); Felker v. Still, 160 Ga. 104, 105 (1) (127 S. E. 609).

*326 No. 17923. Submitted July 14, 1952 Decided September 2, 1952. J. P. Dukes, for plaintiff in error. Albert A. DeLorge, contra.

3. In this case the record shows that the defendant was served with a copy of the petition and process on February 14, 1952; that he filed a general demurrer to the petition on March 15, 1952; that the court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition on March 18, 1952; and that the ruling on the demurrer was not excepted to; but that, on April 4, 1952, the plaintiff filed a motion to vacate and set aside the judgment on the demurrer, alleging that it was null and void because the demurrer was not filed within thirty days after service of the petition and process as required by law. Applying the rules announced in the two preceding notes, and taking judicial cognizance of the fact that the month of February, 1952, had twenty-nine days, it was not erroneous, as contended, for the court to deny the plaintiff’s motion; and this is true because the demurrer was filed within the time allowed by law.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P.J., and Almand, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Smith, 72 S.E.2d 318, 209 Ga. 325, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 535 (Ga. 1952).

72 S.E.2d 318 (Sullivan v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Angela Wall v. Donny James
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2021
Stewart Oil Co., Inc. v. Schell
93 S.E.2d 700 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)