Sullivan v. Schmul
This text of 164 A.D. 902 (Sullivan v. Schmul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the proof adduced by plaintiff at the close of his case presented as a question of fact for the jury whether the father of plaintiff had emancipated the plaintiff, or had consented that plaintiff might receive his own wages. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 A.D. 902, 148 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-schmul-nyappdiv-1914.