Sullivan v. Navistar International Co.

510 So. 2d 998, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1727, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9384
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 14, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 510 So. 2d 998 (Sullivan v. Navistar International Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. Navistar International Co., 510 So. 2d 998, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1727, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9384 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment on authority of Henley v. J.I. Case Co., 510 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (the products liability statute of repose which requires that the action be commenced within the twelve-year period is inapplicable to wrongful death actions).

Reversed and remanded.

We certify the same question certified in Henley:

DOES THE STATUTE OF REPOSE BAR A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION WHERE THE DEATH OCCURRED MORE THAN TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE ORIGINAL PURCHASE OF THE PRODUCT WHICH ALLEGEDLY CAUSED THE DEATH?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Navistar International Co. v. Sullivan
521 So. 2d 1084 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 So. 2d 998, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1727, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-navistar-international-co-fladistctapp-1987.