Sullivan v. Mulvihill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Sullivan v. Mulvihill

269 Mass. 125

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedNovember 12, 1929

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 Mass. 125 (Sullivan v. Mulvihill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullivan v. Mulvihill, 269 Mass. 125 (Mass. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This is an appeal from a decree of a probate court dismissing a petition to vacate decrees dated June 13, 1925, and January 20, 1926. No evidence was reported and no finding of fact was made by the probate judge. The only possible question open is whether the decree could properly have been entered on the pleadings. Brogna v. Commissioner of Banks, 248 Mass. 241, 243. Manifestly such decree rightly could have been entered. It is too plain for discussion that there is no error of law in the entry of the decree here appealed from.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This is an appeal from a decree of a probate court dismissing a petition to vacate decrees dated June 13, 1925, and January 20, 1926. No evidence was reported and no finding of fact was made by the probate judge. The only possible question open is whether the decree could properly have been entered on the pleadings. Brogna v. Commissioner of Banks, 248 Mass. 241, 243. Manifestly such decree rightly could have been entered. It is too plain for discussion that there is no error of law in the entry of the decree here appealed from.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 Mass. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-mulvihill-mass-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack