Sullivan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

54 N.E. 879, 174 Mass. 467, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 955
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 21, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 54 N.E. 879 (Sullivan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 54 N.E. 879, 174 Mass. 467, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 955 (Mass. 1899).

Opinion

Lathrop, J.

The bill of exceptions states that the, plaintiff was named as beneficiary in an application for insurance upon the life of her father, Timothy Sullivan, for the sum of $500. It also states that the policy is dated May 2, 1887, and that premiums, to the amount of $565, were paid to the defendant on account of the insurance, when payment ceased, and this action was brought to recover back that amount less $10 received as a dividend. The date of the writ is June 15,1898.

The ground upon which the plaintiff seeks to recover the premiums is that the policy was void and never attached, on account of the failure to comply, in making the application, with certain rules of the company, which required that the person insured should have knowledge of the insurance, and should sign the application on the back thereof, and should be examined by a physician.

The difficulty with the plaintiff’s case is that there was no privity between her and the defendant; and the case she relies upon of Fisher v. Metropolitan Ins. Co. 160 Mass. 386, and 162 Mass. 236, does not apply. One McCann caused the insurance to be effected without the knowledge of the plaintiff or her father, and paid all the premiums which were paid. There is no evidence that the plaintiff paid any premium, or that McCann, in paying them, acted as the agent of the plaintiff. Under these circumstances we see no ground upon which this action can be maintained.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. Van Antwerp Realty Corp.
10 So. 2d 849 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)
LaRocca v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
36 N.E.2d 126 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)
McCann v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
58 N.E. 1026 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 N.E. 879, 174 Mass. 467, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-mass-1899.