Sullivan v. Maine Dep't of Health and Human Svs.
This text of Sullivan v. Maine Dep't of Health and Human Svs. (Sullivan v. Maine Dep't of Health and Human Svs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION YORK, ss. DOCKET NO. AP-12-17
PATRICIA A. SULLNAN,
Petitioner
v. ORDER
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent
This matter was heard on oral argument on Petitioner's SOC appeal. Petitioner
was present pro se and the State was represented by Assistant Attorney General Tracy
Quadro.
The role of the superior court on an SOC appeal is limited to reversing or
modifying an administrative decision if the findings or conclusions are unsupported by
substantial evidence on the whole record. 5 M.R.S. §11007(4)(C)(5). The agency's
factual determinations must be sustained unless shown to be clearly erroneous.
Imagineering, Inc. v. Superintendent of Ins., 593 A.2d 1050, 1053 (Me. 1991); Bisclwffv. Bd. of
Trustees, 661 A.2d 167, 170 (Me. 1995) (holding Law Court will not overturn conclusions
supported by competent and substantial evidence). Accordingly, absent a finding of
abuse of discretion, bias or error of law or findings not supported by substantial
evidence in the record as required by 5 M.R.S. §11007(C), the agency's actions must be
affirmed. There is competent medical evidence as well as receipt of unemployment
benefits to support the administrative decision so it is affirmed and the appeal is
denied.
At oral argument Patricia made it clear that her anxiety symptoms were
worsening and both the court and Assistant Attorney General Quadro indicated if her
condition had worsened since hearing she could certainly reapply for benefits.
However, as noted above on appeal this court does not substitute how it might
have decided a case but rather review if the decision was suppo_rted by evidence in the
record.
Accordingly, appeal denied.
The Clerk may incorporate this order in the docket by reference.
Dated: July i'o , 2012
John H. O'Neil, Jr. Justice, Superior Court
PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Patricia Sullivan, pro-se Tracy Quadro, Esq. 72 Greenwood Street Office of the Attorney General Eliot, ME 03903 6 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0006
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sullivan v. Maine Dep't of Health and Human Svs., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-maine-dept-of-health-and-human-svs-mesuperct-2012.