Sullivan v. Katz

7 A.D.3d 513, 775 N.Y.S.2d 593
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), entered January 31, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant and against them, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the evidence adduced at trial did not warrant instructing the jury under PJI3d 2:71 (2004 Supp) as to concurrent causes (see Getlin v St. Vincent's Hosp. & Med. Ctr. of N.Y., 117 AD2d 707, 708 [1986]).

The jury verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see McKnight v LaGuardia Hosp., 263 AD2d 500, 501 [1999]). Altman, J.P., Smith, S. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Katz, 7 A.D.3d 513, 775 N.Y.S.2d 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 513 (Sullivan v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trudel v. Donnenfeld
29 A.D.3d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)