Sullivan v. Isadore Rosen & Sons, Inc.
This text of 36 A.D.2d 809 (Sullivan v. Isadore Rosen & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[810]*810Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Kupferman and McNally, JJ.; Nunez, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I would affirm for the reasons stated by the Appellate Term majority. Since appellant stipulated to judgment absolute, judgment should be entered against it on the issue of liability and to be followed by an assessment of damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A.D.2d 809, 320 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-isadore-rosen-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1971.