Sullivan v. Greene & Zinner, P. C.

183 Misc. 2d 328, 704 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 633
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 23, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 183 Misc. 2d 328 (Sullivan v. Greene & Zinner, P. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. Greene & Zinner, P. C., 183 Misc. 2d 328, 704 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs, plaintiffs [329]*329cross motion for summary judgment denied and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.

Plaintiff alleged in her affidavit that all bills for her services were sent to defendant and paid for on the defendant firm’s own checks. However, at best, this presents a question of fact as to whether the attorneys assumed responsibility for payment (Urban Ct. Reporting v Davis, 158 AD2d 401).

Ingrassia, J. P., Palella and Levitt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Urban Court Reporting, Inc. v. Davis
158 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 Misc. 2d 328, 704 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-greene-zinner-p-c-nyappterm-1999.