Sullivan v. Greene & Zinner, P. C.

183 Misc. 2d 328, 704 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 633
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 23, 1999·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs, plaintiffs [329]*329cross motion for summary judgment denied and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.

Plaintiff alleged in her affidavit that all bills for her services were sent to defendant and paid for on the defendant firm’s own checks. However, at best, this presents a question of fact as to whether the attorneys assumed responsibility for payment (Urban Ct. Reporting v Davis, 158 AD2d 401).

Ingrassia, J. P., Palella and Levitt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Greene & Zinner, P. C., 183 Misc. 2d 328, 704 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

183 Misc. 2d 328 (Sullivan v. Greene & Zinner, P. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Urban Court Reporting, Inc. v. Davis
158 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)