Sullivan v. Finnegan

101 Mass. 447
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The demurrer admits that the plaintiff is in possession of one of the rooms in the dwelling-house on the premises, occupying it as her home and claiming title thereto. Tt also admits that the defendants claim title to the premises, including the room, under a deed from Timothy Sullivan tc Thomas Finnegan, and that this is not a valid deed, but con stitutes a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title. The plaintiff cannot maintain a writ of entry to try her title to the room, without abandoning her possession; and therefore she may maintain this bill to remove the cloud from her title. Clouston v. Shearer 99 Mass. 209.

[449]*449It is not necessary to decide at present how far equity, having obtained jurisdiction, will make the remedy complete as to the whole of the premises. Demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Finnegan, 101 Mass. 447 (Mass. 1869).

101 Mass. 447 (Sullivan v. Finnegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCartin Leisure Industries, Inc. v. Baker
378 N.E.2d 980 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1978)
Hooker v. Porter
171 N.E. 713 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Mead v. Cutler
94 N.E. 478 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.
140 F. 801 (Eighth Circuit, 1905)
Sawyer v. Cook
74 N.E. 356 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
National Bank v. Levy
28 N.E. 592 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)
Tobin v. Gillespie
25 N.E. 88 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
DeCamp v. Carnahan
26 W. Va. 839 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
Chapman v. Brewer
114 U.S. 158 (Supreme Court, 1885)
Lamb v. Farrell
21 F. 5 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1884)
Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Shook
69 Ala. 486 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)
Plant v. Barclay
56 Ala. 561 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)