Sullivan v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

634 So. 2d 794, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3255, 1994 WL 112154
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 1994·No. No. 93-1923·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William and Mary Sullivan appeal from a final judgment awarding the FDIC a deficiency following a foreclosure. We reverse the deficiency judgment and remand for a full evidentiary hearing on the issue of the fair market value of the property.1 At the hearing, once the FDIC introduces evidence of the foreclosure sale price, “the defendant has the burden of going forward and presenting such evidence as he shall find proper concerning the fair market value of the property. In the absence of such evidence, the trial court has the power to act upon the assumption that the sale price reflects the fair market value.” Fara Mfg. Co. v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 366 So.2d 164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 634 So. 2d 794, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3255, 1994 WL 112154 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

634 So. 2d 794 (Sullivan v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fara Manufacturing Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
366 So. 2d 164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)