Sullivan v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.
This text of 574 P.2d 686 (Sullivan v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether or not claimant’s myocardial infarction is compensable. The referee and Board held that it was. All the medical evidence from four different doctors supports compensability, albeit with varying degrees of assurance. The employer’s principal argument is that this medical evidence is based upon misstatements of fact by the claimant to the doctors. We do not find the misstatements substantial. Furthermore, the referee found that claimant was credible.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
574 P.2d 686, 32 Or. App. 487, 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 3124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-edward-hines-lumber-co-orctapp-1978.