Sullivan v. Deerbrook Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sullivan v. Deerbrook Insurance Co.

202 S.W.3d 87, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1470, 2006 WL 2806504

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 3, 2006·No. No. ED 86894·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Luttrell appeals the judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of Melissa Sullivan on her claim of negligent [88] operation of a motor vehicle. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Luttrell’s motion to transfer venue based on the alleged pretensive join-der of Deerbrook Insurance Company. Further, the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Sullivan to testify that her doctors recommended she undergo back surgery.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Luttrell appeals the judgment entered after a jury verdict in favor of Melissa Sullivan on her claim of negligent [88] operation of a motor vehicle. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Luttrell’s motion to transfer venue based on the alleged pretensive join-der of Deerbrook Insurance Company. Further, the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Sullivan to testify that her doctors recommended she undergo back surgery.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Sullivan v. Deerbrook Insurance Co., 202 S.W.3d 87, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1470, 2006 WL 2806504 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

202 S.W.3d 87 (Sullivan v. Deerbrook Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.