Sullivan v. Davis

Supreme Court of Vermont

Sullivan v. Davis

50 Vt. 648

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Barrett, J.

The law of the subject of the exemption of horses from attachment and execution is sufficiently propounded, developed, and illustrated in Hickok v. Thayer, 49 Vt., Webster v. Orne, 45 Vt., and Mundell v. Hammond, 40 Vt., for all practical purposes to be served in the present case. It is sufficient, therefore, to say that the horse in question, as it is set forth in the exceptions, was not exempt.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Barrett, J.

The law of the subject of the exemption of horses from attachment and execution is sufficiently propounded, developed, and illustrated in Hickok v. Thayer, 49 Vt., Webster v. Orne, 45 Vt., and Mundell v. Hammond, 40 Vt., for all practical purposes to be served in the present case. It is sufficient, therefore, to say that the horse in question, as it is set forth in the exceptions, was not exempt.

Judgment affirmed.

Sullivan v. Davis, 50 Vt. 648 (Vt. 1878).

Pincite

50 Vt. 648 (Sullivan v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related