Sullivan v. Cook

Supreme Court of Florida

Sullivan v. Cook

129 So. 612, 100 Fla. 397

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 30, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofoie been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and t'he Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court *398 that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofoie been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and t'he Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court *398 that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Sullivan v. Cook, 129 So. 612, 100 Fla. 397 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

129 So. 612 (Sullivan v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.