Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 30, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-00072
StatusUnknown

This text of Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security (Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D.N.C. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:23-cv-00072-RJC

CRYSTAL GAYLE SULLIVAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Order COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY , ) ) Defendant. ) )

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs under 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. No. 12), to which Defendant does not object. Having reviewed the motion and supporting materials, the Court orders as follows: 1. That the Social Security Administration shall pay $6,000.00 in attorney fees and $402.00 in costs to Plaintiff in full settlement and satisfaction of any and all claims for attorney fees for legal services rendered under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 2. With respect to Plaintiff’s signed assignment of EAJA fees to her attorney, in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first and, if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will exercise its discretion and honor the assignment of EAJA fees and pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney’s Fees, (Doc. No. 12), is GRANTED.

Signed: January 30, 2024

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. ed, United States District Judge “ae

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ncwd-2024.