Sullivan v. City of Buffalo

New York Court of Appeals

Sullivan v. City of Buffalo

594 N.E.2d 938, 79 N.Y.2d 1038, 584 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1347

DecidedMay 12, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 594 N.E.2d 938 (Sullivan v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullivan v. City of Buffalo, 594 N.E.2d 938, 79 N.Y.2d 1038, 584 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1347 (N.Y. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from those portions of the Appellate Division order that dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Burnwell Gas of Alden, Inc. and Seimax Wholesale Supply Corp., and from those portions of the Appellate Division order that dismissed certain portions of plaintiffs’ claims against George D. Wilson, Sr., George D. Wilson, Jr., Chimera Radiator Company, Chimera Radiator Manufacturing Co., Inc., Chimera Hamburg Radiator Manufacturing Co., and L.B.G. Radiator Company, Inc., dismissed upon the ground that those portions of the order do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Kenneth Glowacki and James Weed, individually and doing business as Kay-Jay’s Remodeling dismissed as untimely (CPLR 5513 [b]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Hancock, Jr., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from those portions of the Appellate Division order that dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Burnwell Gas of Alden, Inc. and Seimax Wholesale Supply Corp., and from those portions of the Appellate Division order that dismissed certain portions of plaintiffs’ claims against George D. Wilson, Sr., George D. Wilson, Jr., Chimera Radiator Company, Chimera Radiator Manufacturing Co., Inc., Chimera Hamburg Radiator Manufacturing Co., and L.B.G. Radiator Company, Inc., dismissed upon the ground that those portions of the order do not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Kenneth Glowacki and James Weed, individually and doing business as Kay-Jay’s Remodeling dismissed as untimely (CPLR 5513 [b]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Hancock, Jr., taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

594 N.E.2d 938, 79 N.Y.2d 1038, 584 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-city-of-buffalo-ny-1992.