Sullivan v. City of Bartlett
This text of 14 F.3d 602 (Sullivan v. City of Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
14 F.3d 602
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Kenny David SULLIVAN and Linda Sue Sullivan, Individually
and as Guardians of Shannon David Sullivan,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Shelby County Health Care Corporation, also known as The
Med, Intervening Plaintiff
v.
CITY OF BARTLETT, and Dan Weddle, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6662.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 1993.
Before: KEITH and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs, Kenny David Sullivan and Linda Sue Sullivan, appeal from the order of the district court dismissing their lawsuit for failure to state a claim.
Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in dismissing plaintiffs' claim.
As the reasons why the lawsuit should have been dismissed have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order filed on September 24, 1992.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F.3d 602, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37290, 1993 WL 524102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-city-of-bartlett-ca6-1993.