Sullivan v. Bergeron Construction Co.
This text of 700 So. 2d 475 (Sullivan v. Bergeron Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, William F. Sullivan, IV, as personal representative of the estate of Gonzalo Alarcon-Jara, seeks review of a summary final judgment entered in favor of appellees, Bergeron Construction Co., Inc. of Central Florida [“Bergeron”] and Charles Adkins, on their defense of workers’ compensation immunity. We conclude that summary judgment was premature because the record does [476]*476not conclusively demonstrate that there is no material issue of fact concerning whether Bergeron provided a policy of workers’ compensation insurance to its statutory employees, including appellant’s decedent, and whether appellant’s decedent was a statutory employee of Bergeron at the time of the accident. We reverse the appealed summary final judgment and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 So. 2d 475, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 12008, 1997 WL 662473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-bergeron-construction-co-fladistctapp-1997.