Sullivan v. Bankers' Surety Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Sullivan v. Bankers' Surety Co.

102 N.Y.S. 868

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 102 N.Y.S. 868 (Sullivan v. Bankers' Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullivan v. Bankers' Surety Co., 102 N.Y.S. 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

The justice below, informed of facts and circumstances, exercised, apparently without abuse, his discretion in opening upon terms the default of the plaintiff, and his determination calls for no interference here, particularly as leave had been granted to the defendant to serve a supplemental answer, needlessly effusive, even offensive, by borrowed allegations, deemed to be denied elsewhere than in the iterative counterclaim, to which the plaintiff has by order been allowed to reply.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

GILDERSLEEVE and AMEND, J j., concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

The justice below, informed of facts and circumstances, exercised, apparently without abuse, his discretion in opening upon terms the default of the plaintiff, and his determination calls for no interference here, particularly as leave had been granted to the defendant to serve a supplemental answer, needlessly effusive, even offensive, by borrowed allegations, deemed to be denied elsewhere than in the iterative counterclaim, to which the plaintiff has by order been allowed to reply.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

GILDERSLEEVE and AMEND, J j., concur in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 N.Y.S. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-bankers-surety-co-nyappterm-1907.