Sullivan v. Alton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sullivan v. Alton

126 A.D. 941, 111 N.Y.S. 1146

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D. 941 (Sullivan v. Alton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullivan v. Alton, 126 A.D. 941, 111 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Upon the evidence it appears that the negligence complained of, if any there was, was that of the foreman or other employees of the Morthern Light Company, and not of this defendant individually, and that in this respect the verdict of the jury is against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

Upon the evidence it appears that the negligence complained of, if any there was, was that of the foreman or other employees of the Morthern Light Company, and not of this defendant individually, and that in this respect the verdict of the jury is against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D. 941, 111 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-alton-nyappdiv-1908.