Sullivan v. Alexander
18 Johns. 3
This text of 18 Johns. 3 (Sullivan v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sullivan v. Alexander, 18 Johns. 3 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).
Opinion
The motion must be denied. The Court have, not only in Sloan v. Wattles, but in several other cases, allowed the attorney, or a person specially authorized [5]*5by him for that purpose, to alter the teste and return of a writ before it was served.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCracken v. Richardson
46 N.J.L. 50 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1884)
Bray v. Libby
71 Me. 276 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1880)
Osgood v. Norris
21 N.H. 435 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)
Plumer v. Fogg
18 N.H. 559 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1847)
Dearborn v. Twist
6 N.H. 44 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1832)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 Johns. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-alexander-nysupct-1820.