Sullins v. Allen, No. Cv95 0143781 S (Jun. 17, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Sullins v. Allen, No. Cv95 0143781 S (Jun. 17, 1997)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6496

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJune 17, 1997

DocketNo. CV95 0143781 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6496 (Sullins v. Allen, No. Cv95 0143781 S (Jun. 17, 1997)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sullins v. Allen, No. Cv95 0143781 S (Jun. 17, 1997), 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6496 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#121) The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (#121) as to the defendants' "cross-claim" [counterclaim] for indemnification, on the ground that no independent legal relationship existed between the defendants and Judith Sullins, is denied without prejudice to renewal. Contrary to the holding in Atkinson v. Berloni,23 Conn. App. 325, 327-28, 580 A.2d 84 (1990), outside the context of workers' compensation law, a party "need not establish the existence of an independent legal relationship between itself and the alleged indemnitor as a condition for recovery on the basis of a common law claim for indemnity." Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels,Inc., 240 Conn. 694, 701-02, ___ A.2d ___ (1997). Because the present case is outside the context of workers' compensation law, the defendant need not establish an independent legal relationship.

NADEAU, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#121) The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (#121) as to the defendants' "cross-claim" [counterclaim] for indemnification, on the ground that no independent legal relationship existed between the defendants and Judith Sullins, is denied without prejudice to renewal. Contrary to the holding in Atkinson v. Berloni,23 Conn. App. 325, 327-28, 580 A.2d 84 (1990), outside the context of workers' compensation law, a party "need not establish the existence of an independent legal relationship between itself and the alleged indemnitor as a condition for recovery on the basis of a common law claim for indemnity." Skuzinski v. Bouchard Fuels,Inc., 240 Conn. 694, 701-02, ___ A.2d ___ (1997). Because the present case is outside the context of workers' compensation law, the defendant need not establish an independent legal relationship.

NADEAU, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullins-v-allen-no-cv95-0143781-s-jun-17-1997-connsuperct-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack