Sullentrop v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sullentrop v. Director of Revenue

415 S.W.3d 778, 2013 WL 6623765, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 2013·No. No. WD 76038·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Lance C. Sullentrop appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Benton County sustaining the suspension of his driving privileges pursuant to § 302.505. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Lance C. Sullentrop appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Benton County sustaining the suspension of his driving privileges pursuant to § 302.505. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Sullentrop v. Director of Revenue, 415 S.W.3d 778, 2013 WL 6623765, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

415 S.W.3d 778 (Sullentrop v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.