Sullens v. State

889 So. 2d 912, 2004 WL 2827005
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 2004·No. 5D04-676·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

889 So.2d 912 (2004)

Barry SULLENS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D04-676.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 10, 2004.

Flem K. Whited, III and David H. Foxman of Whited, Fuller, Miller & Foxman, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm based on State v. Bolware, 28 FLW D2493, ___ So.2d ___, 2003 WL 22460271 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct.31, 2003), although we recognize that Bolware and this opinion are in conflict with Daniels v. State, 716 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm and certify conflict with Daniels. See also Prianti v. State, 819 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS and TORPY, JJ, and WALSH, J.D., Associate Judge., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullens v. State, 889 So. 2d 912, 2004 WL 2827005 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

889 So. 2d 912 (Sullens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bolware v. State
33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 645 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
McGregory v. State
987 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Johnson v. State
933 So. 2d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)