Sullens v. State
This text of 889 So. 2d 912 (Sullens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Barry SULLENS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Flem K. Whited, III and David H. Foxman of Whited, Fuller, Miller & Foxman, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm based on State v. Bolware, 28 FLW D2493, ___ So.2d ___, 2003 WL 22460271 (Fla. 1st DCA Oct.31, 2003), although we recognize that Bolware and this opinion are in conflict with Daniels v. State, 716 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Accordingly, we affirm and certify conflict with Daniels. See also Prianti v. State, 819 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS and TORPY, JJ, and WALSH, J.D., Associate Judge., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
889 So. 2d 912, 2004 WL 2827005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullens-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.