Sulivan v. Browne

23 F. Cas. 348, 2 Wash. C. C. 204
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 1808
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F. Cas. 348 (Sulivan v. Browne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sulivan v. Browne, 23 F. Cas. 348, 2 Wash. C. C. 204 (circtdpa 1808).

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The rule is in the alternative, that the plaintiff shall try the cause, or be nonsuited. He has a right to say he will try, rather than be nonsuited; and how can we accept his offer to try, when the cause is not in a state for trial? To say that he shall be nonsuited, unless he do what the court will not permit, is to take away the alternative. Were the plaintiff to offer to file a declaration now, still the cause could not be tried without a rule to plead, and a plea filed, and jury struck, or venire issued; but under another rule of this court, made in 1800, all rules to plead, are to be given from month to month in the clerk’s office; and were we to allow a rule to be taken here, we should violate that rule.

Meredith then moved for a rule on defendant to plead in a month.

' BY THE COURT. As the rule laid down in 1806, seems strangely to have been neg[349]*349lected, or may not generally have been known, we will permit this innovation on the standing rule, during this term; but in future motions of this sort will be refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F. Cas. 348, 2 Wash. C. C. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sulivan-v-browne-circtdpa-1808.