Suleiman v. Wexford Health Source, Inc.

N.D. Illinois

Suleiman v. Wexford Health Source, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided December 3, 2018·No. 3:18-cv-50007·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Ammar Suleiman,, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Case No: 18 CV 50007 ) State of Illinois, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Judge Frederick J. Kapala ) ) Magistrate Judge Iain D. Johnston

ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [61] from the magistrate judge that this court grant plaintiffs oral motion be granted, that defendants State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections be voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and that State of Illinois’ motion to dismiss [28] be stricken. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magistrate judge’s R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and grants plaintiff's oral motion, dismisses State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections, and strikes State of Illinois’ motion to dismiss.

Date: 12/3/2018 ENTER:

FREDERICK J. District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Ammar Suleiman,, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Case No: 18 CV 50007 ) State of Illinois, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Judge Frederick J. Kapala ) ) Magistrate Judge Iain D. Johnston

ORDER Before the court is a report and recommendation (“R&R”) [61] from the magistrate judge that this court grant plaintiffs oral motion be granted, that defendants State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections be voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and that State of Illinois’ motion to dismiss [28] be stricken. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magistrate judge’s R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and grants plaintiff's oral motion, dismisses State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections, and strikes State of Illinois’ motion to dismiss.

Date: 12/3/2018 ENTER:

FREDERICK J. District Judge

Suleiman v. Wexford Health Source, Inc., (N.D. Ill. 2018).

Pincite

Suleiman v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. (Suleiman v. Wexford Health Source, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related