Sulcer v. McFatter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sulcer v. McFatter

497 So. 2d 1349, 36 Educ. L. Rep. 251, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2521, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10915

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 3, 1986

DocketNo. 4-86-0246

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 497 So. 2d 1349 (Sulcer v. McFatter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sulcer v. McFatter, 497 So. 2d 1349, 36 Educ. L. Rep. 251, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2521, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10915 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At issue is whether a county school board has the discretionary authority to award attorney’s fees and costs to an employee who prevails in an administrative proceeding. We hold that the board does have such discretion and reverse the board’s holding to the contrary.

Under the provisions of Section 230.03(2), Florida Statutes (1985) a school board has full governmental authority and “may exercise any power except as expressly prohibited by the State Constitution or general law.” That authority, in our view, includes the authority to reimburse employees for attorney’s fees and costs in instances deemed appropriate.

We reject the school board’s assertion that Section 230.234, Florida Statutes (1985), which was enacted before the current provisions of section 230.03(2) became law, bars such a policy. Section 230.234 was enacted at a time when the school board had limited powers and a specific legislative authorization was necessary to provide for legal services to employees. This section specifically authorized fees for employees who were “charged with civil or criminal actions arising out of and in the course of the performance of assigned duties and responsibilities.” Such a grant of authority is unnecessary under the current provisions of section 230.03(2), and the existence of such a specific grant does not bar the award of fees in other appropriate situations. Our holding should not be construed as mandating an award of fees. Rather, we are holding that the board possesses the authority to award fees.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and WILLIS, BEN C., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

At issue is whether a county school board has the discretionary authority to award attorney’s fees and costs to an employee who prevails in an administrative proceeding. We hold that the board does have such discretion and reverse the board’s holding to the contrary.

Under the provisions of Section 230.03(2), Florida Statutes (1985) a school board has full governmental authority and “may exercise any power except as expressly prohibited by the State Constitution or general law.” That authority, in our view, includes the authority to reimburse employees for attorney’s fees and costs in instances deemed appropriate.

We reject the school board’s assertion that Section 230.234, Florida Statutes (1985), which was enacted before the current provisions of section 230.03(2) became law, bars such a policy. Section 230.234 was enacted at a time when the school board had limited powers and a specific legislative authorization was necessary to provide for legal services to employees. This section specifically authorized fees for employees who were “charged with civil or criminal actions arising out of and in the course of the performance of assigned duties and responsibilities.” Such a grant of authority is unnecessary under the current provisions of section 230.03(2), and the existence of such a specific grant does not bar the award of fees in other appropriate situations. Our holding should not be construed as mandating an award of fees. Rather, we are holding that the board possesses the authority to award fees.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and WILLIS, BEN C., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 So. 2d 1349, 36 Educ. L. Rep. 251, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2521, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sulcer-v-mcfatter-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack