Sukman v. Ihle
133 A. 779, 100 N.J. Eq. 598
This text of 133 A. 779 (Sukman v. Ihle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sukman v. Ihle, 133 A. 779, 100 N.J. Eq. 598 (N.J. 1927).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bentley.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tkenchakd, Mintubn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacii, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskikk, McGlekkon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Art Photo v. Kent Parking Garage
37 A.2d 419 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Hardy v. Hangen
34 A.2d 642 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 A. 779, 100 N.J. Eq. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sukman-v-ihle-nj-1927.