Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.
120 A.D.2d 805, 501 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56934
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 A.D.2d 9 →
Opinion
— Motions for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err, as a matter of law, in affirming Special Term’s order?” Kane, J. P., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co., 120 A.D.2d 805, 501 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
120 A.D.2d 805 (Sukljian v. Charles Ross & Son Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.