Suklin v. Brooklyn Edison Co.
237 A.D. 850
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 237 A.D. 850 (Suklin v. Brooklyn Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Suklin v. Brooklyn Edison Co., 237 A.D. 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Order, in so far as it denies petition for a peremptory mandamus order, unanimously affirmed, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Montalvo v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
110 Misc. 2d 24 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Dworman v. Consolidated Edison Co.
26 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suklin-v-brooklyn-edison-co-nyappdiv-1932.