Suklin v. Brooklyn Edison Co.
237 A.D. 850
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order, in so far as it denies petition for a peremptory mandamus order, unanimously affirmed, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suklin v. Brooklyn Edison Co., 237 A.D. 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
237 A.D. 850 (Suklin v. Brooklyn Edison Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montalvo v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
110 Misc. 2d 24 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Dworman v. Consolidated Edison Co.
26 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)