Sukiennik v. Dairymen's League Coop., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sukiennik v. Dairymen's League Coop., Inc.

45 A.D.2d 779, 356 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.2d 779 (Sukiennik v. Dairymen's League Coop., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sukiennik v. Dairymen's League Coop., Inc., 45 A.D.2d 779, 356 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 27,1972, which reversed a referee’s decision disallowing the claim and found that the decedent’s death on May 21,1971 was causally related to a prior accidental heart injury suffered on October 11, 1965. The board found: “ On the basis of the reports and testimony of Dr. Taylor that as a result of the infarction sustained on 10/11/65, decedent continued to suffer from recurrent angina, and that the heart muscle scar which formed after that attack produced an area of irritability which was a competent producing cause of the cardiac arrhymthmia.” There is substantial evidence to [780]*780sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 27,1972, which reversed a referee’s decision disallowing the claim and found that the decedent’s death on May 21,1971 was causally related to a prior accidental heart injury suffered on October 11, 1965. The board found: “ On the basis of the reports and testimony of Dr. Taylor that as a result of the infarction sustained on 10/11/65, decedent continued to suffer from recurrent angina, and that the heart muscle scar which formed after that attack produced an area of irritability which was a competent producing cause of the cardiac arrhymthmia.” There is substantial evidence to [780]*780sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 779, 356 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sukiennik-v-dairymens-league-coop-inc-nyappdiv-1974.