Sukhu v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Sukhu v. United States

607 F. App'x 328

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 24, 2015

DocketNo. 15-6282

StatusPublished

This text of 607 F. App'x 328 (Sukhu v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sukhu v. United States, 607 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anirudh Lakhan Sukhu appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sukhu v. United States, Nos. 1:15-cv-00120-WDQ; 1:08-cr-00557-WD (D.Md. Jan. 29, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presénted in the materials before this court and ar[329]*329gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anirudh Lakhan Sukhu appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sukhu v. United States, Nos. 1:15-cv-00120-WDQ; 1:08-cr-00557-WD (D.Md. Jan. 29, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presénted in the materials before this court and ar[329]*329gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

607 F. App'x 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sukhu-v-united-states-ca4-2015.