Sukhu v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Sukhu v. United States

607 F. App'x 328

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2015·No. No. 15-6282·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anirudh Lakhan Sukhu appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sukhu v. United States, Nos. 1:15-cv-00120-WDQ; 1:08-cr-00557-WD (D.Md. Jan. 29, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presénted in the materials before this court and ar[329] gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anirudh Lakhan Sukhu appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sukhu v. United States, Nos. 1:15-cv-00120-WDQ; 1:08-cr-00557-WD (D.Md. Jan. 29, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presénted in the materials before this court and ar[329] gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sukhu v. United States, 607 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

607 F. App'x 328 (Sukhu v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.