Suk Ching Chan v. Otis Elevator Co.
147 A.D.2d 395, 538 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered June 22, 1988, which, inter alia., granted plaintiff-respondent’s motion to discover certain incident or accident reports, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
This determination is solely addressed to discoverability, and does not constitute a holding with respect to the admissibility of these reports at trial. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Suk Ching Chan v. Otis Elevator Co., 147 A.D.2d 395, 538 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
147 A.D.2d 395 (Suk Ching Chan v. Otis Elevator Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bubar v. Brodman
30 Misc. 3d 324 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)