Suk Ching Chan v. Otis Elevator Co.

147 A.D.2d 395, 538 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 A.D.2d 395 (Suk Ching Chan v. Otis Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suk Ching Chan v. Otis Elevator Co., 147 A.D.2d 395, 538 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered June 22, 1988, which, inter alia., granted plaintiff-respondent’s motion to discover certain incident or accident reports, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This determination is solely addressed to discoverability, and does not constitute a holding with respect to the admissibility of these reports at trial. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bubar v. Brodman
30 Misc. 3d 324 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 A.D.2d 395, 538 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suk-ching-chan-v-otis-elevator-co-nyappdiv-1989.