Suk Ching Chan v. Otis Elevator Co.
This text of 147 A.D.2d 395 (Suk Ching Chan v. Otis Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered June 22, 1988, which, inter alia., granted plaintiff-respondent’s motion to discover certain incident or accident reports, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
This determination is solely addressed to discoverability, and does not constitute a holding with respect to the admissibility of these reports at trial. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 A.D.2d 395, 538 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suk-ching-chan-v-otis-elevator-co-nyappdiv-1989.