Suitter v. Holiday Inn Southwest

Missouri Court of Appeals

Suitter v. Holiday Inn Southwest

864 S.W.2d 436, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1753, 1993 WL 453636

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1993·No. No. 63233·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Kenneth Suitter d/b/a Sound Investment, brought an action against defendant, Holiday Inn Southwest, seeking injunc-tive relief and damages for the alleged breach of a non-competition agreement in an employment contract between him and defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court, in a court-tried case, in favor of defendant.

[437]*437We have reviewed the record on appeal. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Kenneth Suitter d/b/a Sound Investment, brought an action against defendant, Holiday Inn Southwest, seeking injunc-tive relief and damages for the alleged breach of a non-competition agreement in an employment contract between him and defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court, in a court-tried case, in favor of defendant.

[437]*437We have reviewed the record on appeal. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Suitter v. Holiday Inn Southwest, 864 S.W.2d 436, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1753, 1993 WL 453636 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

864 S.W.2d 436 (Suitter v. Holiday Inn Southwest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.