Suiter v. Swift & Co. Fertilizer Works
This text of 20 S.E.2d 293 (Suiter v. Swift & Co. Fertilizer Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe appeal was from a judgment of tbe Superior Court affirming an award made to tbe plaintiffs by tbe North Carolina Industrial Commission as compensation under tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act for tbe death of Joseph E. Suiter.
*542 The defendants admitted the employment, but claimed that Suiter was an independent contractor and, moreover, if an employee within the terms of the Act, that he was not at the time of his death engaged in the duties of such employment.
Upon the hearing of the matter, the Court divided three to three, Justice Schenclc not sitting.
Under the Rule of Court, the judgment of the court below stands affirmed, and this decision does not become a precedent.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 S.E.2d 293, 221 N.C. 541, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suiter-v-swift-co-fertilizer-works-nc-1942.