Suisman v. HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST COMPANY

83 F.2d 1019
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 1936
Docket358
StatusPublished

This text of 83 F.2d 1019 (Suisman v. HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suisman v. HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST COMPANY, 83 F.2d 1019 (2d Cir. 1936).

Opinion

83 F.2d 1019 (1936)

Sarah P. SUISMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST COMPANY, as Executor of the ESTATE of Robert O. EATON, Formerly Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Connecticut, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 358.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 4, 1936.

Henry M. Gretsch, of New York City, for appellant.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Norman D. Keller, and Paul R. Russell, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Robert P. Butler, U. S. Atty., and George H. Cohen, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Hartford, Conn., for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment (15 F.Supp. 113) affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suisman v. Eaton
15 F. Supp. 113 (D. Connecticut, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 F.2d 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suisman-v-hartford-connecticut-trust-company-ca2-1936.