Suisman v. HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST COMPANY
This text of 83 F.2d 1019 (Suisman v. HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sarah P. SUISMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The HARTFORD-CONNECTICUT TRUST COMPANY, as Executor of the ESTATE of Robert O. EATON, Formerly Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Connecticut, Defendant-Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Henry M. Gretsch, of New York City, for appellant.
Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Norman D. Keller, and Paul R. Russell, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Robert P. Butler, U. S. Atty., and George H. Cohen, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Hartford, Conn., for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment (15 F.Supp. 113) affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 F.2d 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suisman-v-hartford-connecticut-trust-company-ca2-1936.