Suire v. State Commissioner

Fourth Circuit

Suire v. State Commissioner

549 F. App'x 189

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 24, 2013·No. No. 13-7795·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Myron Suire appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Suire v. State Comm’r, No. 1:13-cv-03106-JKB (D.Md. Oct. 24, 2013). We also deny Suire’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Myron Suire appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Suire v. State Comm’r, No. 1:13-cv-03106-JKB (D.Md. Oct. 24, 2013). We also deny Suire’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Suire v. State Commissioner, 549 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

549 F. App'x 189 (Suire v. State Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related